4.3 Article

Methylation matters: FK506 binding protein 51 (FKBP5) methylation moderates the associations of FKBP5 genotype and resistant attachment with stress regulation

期刊

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 491-503

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S095457941700013X

关键词

-

资金

  1. Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam
  2. Erasmus University Rotterdam
  3. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw)
  4. Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging [050-060-810]
  5. Genetic Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC
  6. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [VIDI 016.136.361]
  7. European Research Council [ERC-2014-CoG-64916]
  8. European Union [633595]
  9. Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science
  10. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Gravitation program, SPINOZA, VICI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The parent-child attachment relationship plays an important role in the development of the infant's stress regulation system. However, genetic and epigenetic factors such as FK506 binding protein 51 (FKBP5) genotype and DNA methylation have also been associated with hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning. In the current study, we examined how parent-child dyadic regulation works in concert with genetic and epigenetic aspects of stress regulation. We study the associations of attachment, extreme maternal insensitivity, FKBP5 single nucleotide polymorphism 1360780, and FKBP5 methylation, with cortisol reactivity to the Strange Situation Procedure in 298 14-month-old infants. The results indicate that FKBP5 methylation moderates the associations of FKBP5 genotype and resistant attachment with cortisol reactivity. We conclude that the inclusion of epigenetics in the field of developmental psychopathology may lead to a more precise picture of the interplay between genetic makeup and parenting in shaping stress reactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据