4.1 Review

Female urinary microbiota

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 282-286

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000396

关键词

lower urinary tract disorders; urinary incontinence; urinary microbiota; urinary tract infection

资金

  1. NIH [R01DK104718 2U10 HD41250, U01 DK58229, R21 DK097435, R56 DK104718, P20 DK108268]
  2. Falk Foundation
  3. Loyola University Chicago [RFC LU206998]
  4. Astellas Scientific and Medical Affairs Inc. [VESI-12D01, MYRB-15A01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review The newly discovered female urinary microbiota has the potential to deepen our understanding of urinary tract health and disease, including common lower urinary tract conditions such as urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection. The spectrum of painful bladder disorders and other less common conditions also may benefit from additional research that includes consideration of the resident bacterial community of the female bladder. The present review provides a clinical context for the rapidly emerging research regarding the female urinary microbiota and its relationships with urinary tract conditions of interest. Recent findings Studies using culture-independent techniques confirm prior reports of bacteria that reside in the female urinary bladder. These resident communities, the female urinary microbiota, possess characteristics that differ between women affected by urgency urinary incontinence and matched, unaffected controls. Enhanced urine culture techniques permit cultivation of organisms, including uropathogens, missed by standard urine culture, but detected by culture-independent sequencing techniques. Summary New technology is available. Clinical laboratories can modify traditional standard urine culture methods to enhance detection of uropathogens. However, given the existence of the female urinary microbiota, the simple presence of bacteria in the lower urinary tract should not be taken as evidence of infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据