4.4 Review

Oxidative Oxidative stress in sepsis: Pathophysiological implications justifying antioxidant co-therapy

期刊

BURNS
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 471-485

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.09.023

关键词

Sepsis; Inflammation; Oxidative stress; Antioxidants; Co-therapy; Selenium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sepsis is one of the main causes of death among critically ill patients. Sepsis pathogenesis includes infection by gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, fungi, or both; exacerbated inflammatory response; hypotension, with potential to cause vasodilatory'shock; and lesser delivery of oxygen to tissues due to impairment of oxygen utilization by cells. The participation of reactive species and/or free radicals such as nitric oxide (NO center dot), peroxynitrite (ONOO-), superoxide (O-2,(center dot-)) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical ((OH)-O-center dot) has been reported to underlie these effects. Mitochondrial dysfunction is related to loss of inner membrane potential and inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transfer chain and FoF1-adenosine triphosphate-synthase, resulting in cellular energetic failure. In addition, overproduction of NO center dot due to inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity has been associated with harmful effects such as general vasodilatation and hypo-responsiveness to therapeutic vasoconstrictor agents. Considering that iNOS expression is regulated by nuclear factor-kappa B, which may be activated by ROS, antioxidants could inhibit the overexpression of iNOS in sepsis. In line with this, several antioxidants such as vitamins C and E, polyphenols, melatonin,beta-glucan, N-acetylcysteine, mitochondrion-targeted antioxidants (MitoQ MitoE, and peptides associated with dimethyltyrosine), selenium salts, and organoselenium compounds were effective in ameliorating oxidative stress in animal models of sepsis and in a number of clinical trials with septic patients. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据