4.8 Article

Science foresight using life-cycle analysis, text mining and clustering: A case study on natural ventilation

期刊

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 270-280

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.027

关键词

Science foresight; Life-cycle analysis; Knowledge gap identification; Sensitivity analysis; Text mining; Wind catcher

资金

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) [FWO 12M5316N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Science foresight comprises a range of methods to analyze past, present and expected research trends, and uses this information to predict the future status of different fields of science and technology. With the ability to identify high-potential development directions, science foresight can be a useful tool to support the management and planning of future research activities. Science foresight analysts can choose from a rather large variety of approaches. There is, however, relatively little information about how the various approaches can be applied in an effective way. This paper describes a three-step methodological framework for science foresight on the basis of published research papers, consisting of (i) life-cycle analysis, (ii) text mining and (iii) knowledge gap identification by means of automated clustering. The three steps are connected using the research methodology of the research papers, as identified by text mining. The potential of combining these three steps in one frame worlds illustrated by analyzing scientific literature on wind catchers; a natural ventilation concept which has received considerable attention from academia, but with quite low application in practice. The knowledge gaps that are identified show that the automated foresight analysis is indeed able to find uncharted research areas. Results from a sensitivity analysis further show the importance of using full-texts for text mining instead of only title, keywords and abstract. The paper concludes with a reflection on the methodological framework, and gives directions for its intended use in future studies. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据