4.5 Article

Marine protected area restricts demographic connectivity: Dissimilarity in a marine environment can function as a biological barrier

期刊

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 7, 期 19, 页码 7859-7871

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3318

关键词

coral reef fish; larval dispersal; microsatellites; parentage analysis; Philippines

资金

  1. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H01932] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) can often lead to environmental differences between MPAs and fishing zones. To determine the effects on marine dispersal of environmental dissimilarity between an MPA and fishing zone, we examined the abundance and recruitment patterns of two anemonefishes (Amphiprion frenatus and A.perideraion) that inhabit sea anemones in different management zones (i.e., an MPA and two fishing zones) by performing a field survey and a genetic parentage analysis. We found lower levels of abundance per anemone in the MPA compared to the fishing zones for both species (n=1,525 anemones, p=.032). The parentage analysis also showed that lower numbers of fishes were recruited from the fishing zones and outside of the study area into each anemone in the MPA than into each anemone in the fishing zones (n=1,525 anemones, p<.017). However, the number of self-recruit production per female did not differ between the MPA and fishing zones (n=384 females, p=.516). Because the ocean currents around the study site were unlikely to cause a lower settlement intensity of larvae in the MPA, the ocean circulation was not considered crucial to the observed abundance and recruitment patterns. Instead, stronger top-down control and/or a lower density of host anemones in the MPA were potential factors for such patterns. Our results highlight the importance of dissimilarity in a marine environment as a factor that affects connectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据