4.6 Article

p53 and miR-34a Feedback Promotes Lung Epithelial Injury and Pulmonary Fibrosis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 187, 期 5, 页码 1016-1034

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.12.020

关键词

-

资金

  1. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute Clinical Innovator Awards [150063, 082380]
  2. American Heart Association grant [GRNT19020001]
  3. NIH grants [R01HL133067-01, R21ES025815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal interstitial lung disease. The pathogenesis of interstitial lung diseases, including its most common form, IPF, remains poorly understood. Alveolar epithelial cell (AEC) apoptosis, proliferation, and accumulation of myofibroblasts and extracellular matrix deposition results in progressive loss of lung function in IPF. We found induction of tumor suppressor protein, p53, and apoptosis with suppression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and the uPA receptor in AECs from the lungs of IPF patients, and in mice with bleomycin, cigarette smoke, silica, or sepsis-induced lung injury. Treatment with the caveolin-1 scaffolding domain peptide (CSP) reversed these effects. Consistent with induction of p53, AECs from IPF lungs or mice with diverse types of lung injuries showed increased p53 acetylation and miR-34a expression with reduction in Sirt1. This was significantly reduced after treatment of wild-type mice with CSP, and uPA-deficient mice were unresponsive. Bleomycin failed to induce miR-34a in p53- or plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)-deficient mice. CSP-mediated inhibition of miR-34a restored Sirt1, suppressed p53 acetylation and apoptosis in injured AECs, and prevented pulmonary fibrosis (PF). AEC-specific suppression of miR-34a inhibited bleomycin-induced p53, PAI-1, and apoptosis and prevented PF, whereas overexpression of precursor-miR-34a increased p53, PAI-1, and apoptosis in AECs of mice unexposed to bleomycin. Our study validates p53-miR-34a feedback as a potential therapeutic target in PF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据