4.5 Article

Cortical specialisation to social stimuli from the first days to the second year of life: A rural Gambian cohort

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 92-104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.005

关键词

fNIRS; Infancy; Low- and middle-income countries; Nutrition; Poverty; Social cognition

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1005/1, MC_U123292701, G0400120, MR/P012019/1, G0300025] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_U123292701, G0400120, MR/K021389/1, MC_UP_1005/1, G0300025, MR/P012019/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0400120, MR/P012019/1, MR/K021389/1, MC_UP_1005/1, G0300025, MC_U123292701] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain and nervous system development in human infants during the first 1000 days (conception to two years of age) is critical, and compromised development during this time (such as from under nutrition or poverty) can have life-long effects on physical growth and cognitive function. Cortical mapping of cognitive function during infancy is poorly understood in resource-poor settings due to the lack of transportable and low-cost neuroimaging methods. Having established a signature cortical response to social versus non-social visual and auditory stimuli in infants from 4 to 6 months of age in the UK, here we apply this functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) paradigm to investigate social responses in infants from the first postnatal days to the second year of life in two contrasting environments: rural Gambian and urban UK. Results reveal robust, localized, socially selective brain responses from 9 to 24 months of life to both the visual and auditory stimuli. In contrast at 0-2 months of age infants exhibit non-social auditory selectivity, an effect that persists until 4-8 months when we observe a transition to greater social stimulus selectivity. These findings reveal a robust developmental curve of cortical specialisation over the first two years of life. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据