4.2 Editorial Material

Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human-machine systems?

期刊

COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 1-12

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-017-0405-7

关键词

Dissonance engineering; Risk analysis; Conflict evaluation; Behavioural conflict; Knowledge evolution

资金

  1. International Research Group on Human-Machine Systems in Transportation and Industry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses dissonance engineering and its application to risk analysis of human-machine systems. Dissonance engineering relates to sciences and technologies relevant to dissonances, defined as conflicts between knowledge. The richness of the concept of dissonance is illustrated by a taxonomy that covers a variety of cognitive and organisational dissonances based on different conflict modes and baselines of their analysis. Knowledge control is discussed and related to strategies for accepting or rejecting dissonances. This acceptability process can be justified by a risk analysis of dissonances which takes into account their positive and negative impacts and several assessment criteria. A risk analysis method is presented and discussed along with practical examples of application. The paper then provides key points to motivate the development of risk analysis methods dedicated to dissonances in order to identify the balance between the positive and negative impacts and to improve the design and use of future human-machine system by reinforcing knowledge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据