3.8 Article

Soil erosion by water estimated for 99 Uruguayan basins

期刊

CIENCIA E INVESTIGACION AGRARIA
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 184-194

出版社

PONTIFICIA UNIV CATOLICA CHILE, FAC AGRONOMIA INGENIERIA FORESTAL
DOI: 10.7764/rcia.v44i2.1717

关键词

Erosion; GIS; RUSLE; USLE; watersheds

资金

  1. National Agricultural Research Institute (INIA) [INIA SA27]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil erosion can be accelerated by agricultural intensification, and the soil loss can alter the quality of water bodies. Sustainable agricultural production therefore requires the management of erosion and potential water pollution. In Uruguay, where there is heavy use of soil for agriculture, there is a need to continually develop and update erosion management policies. In this framework, we estimated the erosion in 99 drainage basins by analyzing and managing the information required (K, L, S, C and R-factors) in the universal soil loss equation (USLE) and the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in a geographical information system (GIS). The studied drainage basins encompass 73% of the area of Uruguay. The results include the following values: the K-factor range from 0.0073 to 0.088 (t ha h)(ha MJ mm)(-1), the R-factor range from 3,547 to 9,342 (MJ mm)(ha h yr)(-1), the C-factor range from 0 to 0.155, the slope gradients are less than 4.3% in 78% of the soils, and the multiplicative products of L and S are less than 0.73 in 75% of the cases. The drainage basin characteristics allowed the identification of 4 homogeneous regions based on their erosion behavior. The northern-western-southern basins cluster and Sierras del Este basins clusters indicate the possibility of managing their erosion through control of vegetation cover, which is represented by the C-factor. In general, this forecast of soil erosion by water (92.9% of the soil polygons and 99.9% of the drainage basins) indicates a mean soil loss of less than 7 t (ha yr)(-1) corresponding to the land cover surveyed in 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据