4.8 Article

A Specific ChREBP and PPARα Cross-Talk Is Required for the Glucose-Mediated FGF21 Response

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 403-416

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.065

关键词

-

资金

  1. Region Occitanie
  2. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University
  3. ChroME Network (Marie Curie Sklodowska Action) [H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015-675610]
  4. Foundation for the Medical Research (FRM) [DEQ20150331744]
  5. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD) Novonordisk
  6. National Agency for Research (ANR) [ANR-12BSV1-0025-ObeLiP, ANR-15-CE14-0026-Hepatokind]
  7. European Research Council [ERC-2013-StG-336629]
  8. city of Paris

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While the physiological benefits of the fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) hepatokine are documented in response to fasting, little information is available on Fgf21 regulation in a glucose-overload context. We report that peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha), a nuclear receptor of the fasting response, is required with the carbohydrate-sensitive transcription factor carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP) to balance FGF21 glucose response. Microarray analysis indicated that only a few hepatic genes respond to fasting and glucose similarly to Fgf21. Glucose-challenged Chrebp(-/-) mice exhibit a marked reduction in FGF21 production, a decrease that was rescued by re-expression of an active ChREBP isoform in the liver of Chrebp(-/-) mice. Unexpectedly, carbohydrate challenge of hepatic Ppar alpha knockout mice also demonstrated aPPAR alpha-dependent glucose response for Fgf21 that was associated with an increased sucrose preference. This blunted response was due to decreased Fgf21 promoter accessibility and diminished ChREBP binding onto Fgf21 carbohydrate-responsive element (ChoRE) in hepatocytes lacking PPAR alpha. Our study reports that PPAR alpha is required for the ChREBP-induced glucose response of FGF21.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据