4.8 Article

Visualizing Changes in Cdkn1c Expression Links Early-Life Adversity to Imprint Mis-regulation in Adults

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 1090-1099

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [MR/M013960/1]
  2. European Research Council
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. NIHR Imperial BRC
  5. BBSRC grant [BB/J015156]
  6. ERC Advanced Grant [294627]
  7. MRC [MR/K011561/1, MR/M013960/1, MC_U120027516, MC_U120085816, MC_U120097114, MC_UP_A652_1001] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_U120085816, MC_UP_A652_1001, 1116184, MC_U120027516, MR/K011561/1, MC_U120097114, MR/M013960/1, 1375663] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2016-18-023] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [294627] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imprinted genes are regulated according to parental origin and can influence embryonic growth and metabolism and confer disease susceptibility. Here, we designed sensitive allele-specific reporters to non-invasively monitor imprinted Cdkn1c expression in mice and showed that expression was modulated by environmental factors encountered in utero. Acute exposure to chromatin-modifying drugs resulted in de-repression of paternally inherited (silent) Cdkn1c alleles in embryos that was temporary and resolved after birth. In contrast, deprivation of maternal dietary protein in utero provoked permanent de-repression of imprinted Cdkn1c expression that was sustained into adulthood and occurred through a folate-dependent mechanism of DNA methylation loss. Given the function of imprinted genes in regulating behavior and metabolic processes in adults, these results establish imprinting deregulation as a credible mechanism linking early-life adversity to later-life outcomes. Furthermore, Cdkn1c-luciferase mice offer non-invasive tools to identify factors that disrupt epigenetic processes and strategies to limit their long-term impact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据