4.6 Article

Nb-H system at high pressures and temperatures

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 95, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.104110

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11534003, 11604314, 11604290]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0201200]
  3. Changjiang Scholar of Ministry of Education, and Science Challenge Project [JCKY2016212A501]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201206170130]
  5. Russian National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute
  6. European Research Council [267777]
  7. Energy Frontier Research in Extreme Environments Center (EFree), an Energy Frontier Research Center - Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC-0001057]
  8. National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) [DE-NA0002006]
  9. Carnegie/Department of Energy Alliance Center (CDAC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the Nb-H system over extended pressure and temperature ranges to establish the highest level of hydrogen abundancewe could achieve from the resulting alloy. We probed the Nb-H system with laser heating and x-ray diffraction complemented by numerical density functional theory-based simulations. New quenched double hexagonal close-packed (hcp) NbH2.5 appears under 46 GPa, and above 56 GPa cubic NbH3 is formed as theoretically predicted. Nb atoms are arranged in close-packed lattices which are martensitically transformed in the sequence: face-centered cubic (fcc). hcp. double hcp (dhcp). distorted body-centered cubic (bcc) as pressure increases. The appearance of fcc NbH2.5-3 and dhcp NbH2.5 cannot be understood in terms of enthalpic stability, but can be rationalized when finite temperatures are taken into account. The structural and compressional behavior of NbHx>2 is similar to that of NbH. Nevertheless, a direct H-H interaction emerges with hydrogen concentration increases, which manifests itself via a reduction in the lattice expansion induced by hydrogen dissolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据