4.5 Article

Stigmatic pollen delivery by flies and bees: Methods comparing multiple species within a pollinator community

期刊

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 19-25

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2016.12.002

关键词

Diptera; Hymenoptera; Eco-system services; Wild pollinators; Vegetable seed crops; Honey bees; Solitary bees; Blow flies; Hover flies; Pollinator diversity

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [C11X1309]
  2. Foundation for Research Science and Technology programme [CO2X0221]
  3. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [C11X1309] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A wide variety of insect species provide pollination services in natural and agricultural ecosystems, but in order to quantify their contribution it is necessary to evaluate their effectiveness. An important component of this is to determine their ability to transfer pollen to stigmas which typically requires observers to wait for insects to visit focal flowers (static approach); a time-consuming process not amenable to obtaining measures for pollinating species of low local abundance. An alternative method (active approach) is to detach test flowers and present them to the targeted flower visitor. This offers a number of advantages (e.g. increased speed and flexibility), but may alter insect behaviour. We compared pollen deposition within flowering onion crops using three bee (Apoidea) and three fly (Diptera) species. The two approaches resulted in similar numbers of pollen grains being deposited onto stigmas for each insect species, thereby supporting the validity of the active as an alternative to the static approach in our test crop. The ability to rapidly assess stigmatic pollen deposition of a broad range of insects using the active approach can greatly assist assessments of pollinator contribution within plant pollinator assemblages. (C) 2017 Gesellschaft fur Okologie. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据