4.8 Article

Major Roles for Pyrimidine Dimers, Nucleotide Excision Repair, and ATR in the Alternative Splicing Response to UV Irradiation

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 2868-2879

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.066

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica of Argentina [PICT-2011 1617, PICT-2014 2582]
  2. Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACYT) [20020130100152BA]
  3. Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship within the EU Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development [275632]
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [148434]
  5. European Research Council [ERC-StG-LS2-637591]
  6. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [BFU2014-55076-P]
  7. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  8. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC)
  9. Telethon-Italy
  10. University of Milan
  11. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas of Argentina (CONICET)
  12. Alberto J. Roemmers Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously found that UV irradiation promotes RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) hyperphosphorylation and subsequent changes in alternative splicing (AS). We show now that UV-induced DNA damage is not only necessary but sufficient to trigger the AS response and that photolyase-mediated removal of the most abundant class of pyrimidine dimers (PDs) abrogates the global response to UV. We demonstrate that, in keratinocytes, RNAPII is the target, but not a sensor, of the signaling cascade initiated by PDs. The UV effect is enhanced by inhibition of gap-filling DNA synthesis, the last step in the nucleotide excision repair pathway (NER), and reduced by the absence of XPE, the main NER sensor of PDs. The mechanism involves activation of the protein kinase ATR that mediates the UV-induced RNAPII hyperphosphorylation. Our results define the sequence UV-PDs-NER-ATR-RNAPII-AS as a pathway linking DNA damage repair to the control of both RNAPII phosphorylation and AS regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据