4.5 Article

A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance

期刊

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 356, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6460

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cochrane Methods Innovation Funds Round 2 [MTH001F]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [91617050, 91810615]
  3. UK Medical Research Council Network of Hubs for Trials Methodology Research [MR/L004933/1-R20]
  4. MRC partnership grant for the PROGnosis RESearch Strategy (PROGRESS) group [G0902393]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Validation of prediction models is highly recommended and increasingly common in the literature. A systematic review of validation studies is therefore helpful, with meta-analysis needed to summarise the predictive performance of the model being validated across different settings and populations. This article provides guidance for researchers systematically reviewing and meta-analysing the existing evidence on a specific prediction model, discusses good practice when quantitatively summarising the predictive performance of the model across studies, and provides recommendations for interpreting meta-analysis estimates of model performance. We present key steps of the meta-analysis and illustrate each step in an example review, by summarising the discrimination and calibration performance of the EuroSCORE for predicting operative mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据