4.5 Article

One-Step and Surfactant-Free Fabrication of Gold-Nanoparticle-Decorated Bismuth Oxychloride Nanosheets Based on Laser Ablation in Solution and Their Enhanced Visible-Light Plasmonic Photocatalysis

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 1146-1154

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201601261

关键词

BiOCl nanosheets; laser ablation; metal nanoparticles; one-step fabrication; photocatalysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51531006, 11404337, 11374303, 11374300, 11574313]
  2. CAS/SAF International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple synthetic route is presented for fabricating gold nanoparticle (NP)-decorated bismuth oxychloride (BiOCl) nanosheets in one step based on laser ablation of a gold target in a hydrochloric acid solution of bismuth nitrate without surfactant. After laser ablation, BiOCl nanosheets with attached Au NPs are obtained. The nanosheets are sub-micron in the planar dimension and around 20 nm thick, and the Au NPs are a mean size of approximately 20 nm. Further experiments reveal that such Au-NP-decorated nanosheets could be formed at a large Cl/Bi molar ratio range (0.01 to 3) in solution. The formation of the BiOCl nanosheets is attributed to the Au plasma plume-induced local fast hydrothermal reaction, which drives the planar growth of BiOCl. Importantly, these Au-NP-decorated BiOCl nanosheets exhibit high photodegradation activity on rhodamine B, a typical organic pollutant, compared with bare nanosheets under visible light irradiation, and show highly stable and recyclable performance. This is attributed to the plasmonic properties of Au NPs, which increase optical absorption and promote separation of electron-hole pairs in the NP-decorated BiOCl nanosheets. This work provides not only a new plasmonic photocatalyst for the oxidative degradation of organic pollutants, but also a general method for fabrication of the metal-NP-decorated nanosheets of other layer-structured oxychlorides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据