4.8 Article

Impact of PEG Chain Length on the Physical Properties and Bioactivity of PEGylated Chitosan/siRNA Nanoparticles in Vitro and in Vivo

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 14, 页码 12203-12216

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b16556

关键词

chitosan; PEGylation; siRNA delivery; nanoparticles; blood circulation; biodistribution

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PEGylation of cationic polyplexes is a promising approach to enhance the stability and reduce unspecific interaction with biological components. Herein, we systematically investigate the impact of PEGylation on physical and biological properties of chitosan/siRNA polyplexes. A series of chitosan-PEG copolyrners (CS-PEG2k, CS-PEG5k and CS-PEG10k) were synthesized with similar PEG mass content but with different molecular weight. PEGylation with higher molecular weight and less grafting degree resulted in smaller and more compacted nanoparticles with relatively higher surface charge. PEGylated polyplexes showed distinct mechanism of endocytosis, which was macropinocytosis and caveolae-dependent and clathrin-independent. In vitro silencing efficiency in HeLa and H1299 cells was significantly improved by PEGylation and CS,PEGSk/siRNA achieved the highest knockdown efficiency. Efficient silence of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M2 (RRM2) in HeLa cells by CS-PEG5k/siRRM2 significantly induced cell cycle arrest and inhibited cell proliferation. In addition, PEGylation significantly inhibited macrophage phagocytosis and unspecific interaction with red blood cells (RBCs). Significant extension of in vivo circulation was achieved only with high molecular weight PEG modification (CS-PEG10k), whereas all CS/siRNA and CS-PEG/siRNA nanoparticles showed similar pattern of biodistribution with major accumulation in liver and kidney. These results imply that PEGylation with higher molecular weight PEG and less grafting rate is a promising strategy to improve chitosan/siRNA nanocomplexes performance both in vitro and in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据