4.4 Article

Usefulness of the MrWALLETS Scoring System to Predict First Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Ischemic Stroke

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 7, 页码 1023-1029

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.009

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some cryptogenic strokes are caused by undetected paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and could benefit from oral anticoagulation. In this study, we searched for echocardiographic parameters associated with first diagnosed AF, to form a scoring system for the identification of patients with AF. We examined 571 patients with ischemic stroke (72.7 +/- 13.5 years, 50.6% women), subdivided into 4 groups: documented cause without AF, first diagnosed AF, known paroxysmal AF, and permanent AF. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography, brain computed tomography scan, carotid/vertebral ultrasound, and continuous electrocardiographic monitoring. Eight factors independently characterized first diagnosed AF and formed the MrWALLETS score: mitral regurgitation, mild-to-moderate (+ 1), white matter lesions ( 1), age >= 75 years ( + 1), left atrium >= 4 cm (+ 1), cerebral lesion diameter >= 4 cm (+ 1), left ventricular end diastolic volume <65 ml (+ 1), tricuspid regurgitation >= moderate ( + 1), carotid stenosis 50% (-1). In the patients with >= 3 points, positive predictive value was 80%, specificity 97.5%, and sensitivity 57.1%. In the patients with >= 2 points sensitivity rose to 85.7%, but positive predictive value was 47.1%. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.95). There were important differences among AF groups, which therefore could not be merged. In conclusion, 4 echocardiographic parameters, 3 additional instrumental parameters, and age allow the identification of stroke patients with first diagnosed AF with high positive predictive value. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据