4.7 Article

Low velocity bending impact behavior of foam core sandwich beams: Experimental

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 158-175

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.038

关键词

Sandwich beam; Expanded polystyrene foam; Impact; Adhesive; Adhesive bonding

资金

  1. Scientific Research Project Division of Erciyes University [FYL-2014-5055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This experimental study addresses the low velocity impact bending response of sandwich beams with expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam core reinforced by aluminum face -sheets using adhesive bonding technique. The deformation behaviour and the effects of the geometric and mechanical design parameters were investigated to improve the impact energy absorbing capability. The bending impact tests were performed for different foam density, foam and plate thicknesses for three impact energy levels: 4.45 13.05, 26.78 J. The photographs of the permanent deformation geometries of the sandwich beams were presented and the contact force and kinetic energy histories were discussed. The specimens with higher foam core density and thicker,foam core resulted in the lowest permanent central deflections and contact force variations. As the foam core density and thickness were increased, the energy absorbing capability was improved. The specimens having thinner face -sheets exhibited higher contact' force variations and the lower permanent deflection than those of the specimens with thicker face-sheet even for the lowest impact energy. However, as the impact energy was increased, the specimen with thinner face sheet exhibited lower contact force levels and higher permanent deflections than those of the specimens having thicker face -sheets. In addition, the plastic dissipation energy was increased in the face -sheets. The face-sheet thickness was more effective on the permanent deflections, whereas the foam core density was more effective on the energy absorbing capability. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据