4.5 Article

Effect of olive oil phenolic compounds on the expression of blood pressure-related genes in healthy individuals

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 663-670

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-015-1110-z

关键词

Olive oil; Phenolic compounds; Blood pressure; Nutrigenomics; RAAS

资金

  1. EU Commission [QLK1-CT-2001-00287]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III FEDER [RD12-0042, CB06/03/0028, CB06/02/0029, CA11/00215, CM08/00054]
  3. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2012-40144-C03-01, AGL2012-40144-C03-02, AGL2012-40144-C03-03, FPI:BES-2010-040766]
  4. Agency for Management of University and Research [2009 SGR 1195, 2014 SGR 240]
  5. ISCIII [CD10/00224, CP 06/00100]
  6. Health Department of the Catalan Government (Generalitat de Catalunya) [CP 06/00100]
  7. FEDER funds [CB06/03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate whether the ingestion of olive oil having different phenolic contents influences the expression of blood pressure-related genes, involved in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, in healthy humans. A randomized, double-blind, crossover human trial with 18 healthy subjects, who ingested 25 mL/day of olive oils (1) high (366 mg/kg, HPC) and (2) low (2.7 mg/kg, LPC) in phenolic compounds for 3 weeks, preceded by 2-week washout periods. Determination of selected blood pressure-related gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) by qPCR, blood pressure and systemic biomarkers. HPC decreased systolic blood pressure compared to pre-intervention values and to LPC, and maintained diastolic blood pressure values compared to LPC. HPC decreased ACE and NR1H2 gene expressions compared with pre-intervention values, and IL8RA gene expression compared with LPC. The introduction to the diet of an extra-virgin olive oil rich in phenolic compounds modulates the expression of some of the genes related to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. These changes could underlie the decrease in systolic blood pressure observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据