4.8 Article

In Situ Exfoliated, Edge-Rich, Oxygen-Functionalized Graphene from Carbon Fibers for Oxygen Electrocatalysis

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201606207

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51402100, 21573066]
  2. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan [2016JJ1006, 2016TP1009]
  3. National Science Foundation [1561886, 1363123]
  4. US Air Forces MURI program [FA9550-12-1-0037]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1400274] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1561886, 1363123] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-free electrocatalysts have been extensively developed to replace noble metal Pt and RuO2 catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in fuel cells or metal-air batteries. These electrocatalysts are usually deposited on a 3D conductive support (e.g., carbon paper or carbon cloth (CC)) to facilitate mass and electron transport. For practical applications, it is desirable to create in situ catalysts on the carbon fiber support to simplify the fabrication process for catalytic electrodes. In this study, the first example of in situ exfoliated, edge-rich, oxygen-functionalized graphene on the surface of carbon fibers using Ar plasma treatment is successfully prepared. Compared to pristine CC, the plasma-etched carbon cloth (P-CC) has a higher specific surface area and an increased number of active sites for OER and ORR. P-CC also displays good intrinsic electron conductivity and excellent mass transport. Theoretical studies show that P-CC has a low overpotential that is comparable to Pt-based catalysts, as a result of both defects and oxygen doping. This study provides a simple and effective approach for producing highly active in situ catalysts on a carbon support for OER and ORR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据