4.8 Article

Energy-Autonomous, Flexible, and Transparent Tactile Skin

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 27, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201606287

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [PITN-GA-2012-317488-CONTEST]
  2. EPSRC Engineering Fellowship for Growth - PRINTSKIN [EP/M002527/1]
  3. EPSRC First Grant [EP/M002519/1]
  4. James Watt Nanofabrication Centre (JWNC)
  5. Electronics Systems Design Centre (ESDC)
  6. EPSRC [EP/M002519/1, EP/M002527/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M002519/1, EP/M002527/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tactile or electronic skin is needed to provide critical haptic perception to robots and amputees, as well as in wearable electronics for health monitoring and wellness applications. Energy autonomy of skin is a critical feature that would enable better portability and longer operation times. This study shows a novel structure, consisting of a transparent tactile sensitive layer based on single-layer graphene, and a photovoltaic cell underneath as a building block for energy-autonomous, flexible, and tactile skin. Transparency of the touch sensitive layer is considered a key feature to allow the photovoltaic cell to effectively harvest light. Moreover, ultralow power consumed by the sensitive layer (20 nW cm(-2)) further reduces the photovoltaic area required to drive the tactile skin. In addition to its energy autonomy, the fabricated skin is sensitive to touch, mainly because a transparent polymeric protective layer, spin-coated on the sensor's active area, makes the coplanar capacitor sensitive to touch, detecting minimum pressures of 0.11 kPa with a uniform sensitivity of 4.3 Pa-1 along a broad pressure range. Finally, the tactile skin patches are integrated on a prosthetic hand, and the responses of the sensors for static and dynamic stimuli are evaluated by performing tasks, ranging from simple touching to grabbing of soft objects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据