4.7 Article

Effects of mineral admixtures and steel fiber on rheology, strength, and chloride ion penetration resistance characteristics of wet-mix shotcrete mixtures containing crushed aggregates

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 376-384

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.093

关键词

Wet-mix shotcrete; Crushed aggregate; Admixtures; Rheological properties; Strength; Chloride ion penetration resistance

资金

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government [13RDRP-B066780, 15TLRP-B079261-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the effects of various mineral admixtures such as silica fume, fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), and metakaolin and steel fiber on the rheology, strength, and chloride ion penetration resistance characteristics wet-mix shotcrete (WMS) mixtures made with crushed aggregates. The mixtures tested in this study are mostly ternary mixtures blended with silica fume. Potential implications of measured rheological properties in relation to pumping and shooting performance of WMS mixtures were also analyzed. The results have shown that silica fume may be an effective admixture benefiting both pumpability and shootability of WMS. Fly ash was found to adversely affect the pumpability of WMS mixtures by markedly increasing the torque viscosity. GGBFS had non-significant effects on both pumpability and shootability, whereas it strongly improved the chloride ion penetration resistance and strength of WMS. It was also identified that no more than 5% metakaolin by mass of cement is necessary to enhance the pumpability, shootability, and chloride penetration resistance of WMS. Despite many expected advantages of using steel fibers in WMS, special attention should be paid to prevent excessive degradation of pumpability and chloride ion penetration resistance when a high dosage (>50 kg/m(3)) of steel fibers is used. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据