4.8 Article

WNT/β-Catenin Directs Self-Renewal Symmetric Cell Division of hTERThigh Prostate Cancer Stem Cells

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 77, 期 9, 页码 2534-2547

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1887

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2012CB966800, 2013CB967402, 2013CB945600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81630073, 81372189]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes [90-16-03, 90-13-06]
  4. Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning [QD2015002]
  5. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [17QA1402100]
  6. School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University [16XJ11003]
  7. Ren Ji Hospital [RJZZ14-010]
  8. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16JC1405700, 16140902100]
  9. KC Wong Foundation
  10. Special Research Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics
  11. Shanghai Eastern Hospital (Pudong) Stem Cell Research Base Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer stem-like cells (CSC) drive cancer progression and recurrence. Self-renewal expansion of CSC is achieved through symmetric cell division, yet how external stimuli affect intracellular regulatory programs of CSC division modes and stemness remains obscure. Here, we report that the hTERThigh prostate cancer cells exhibit CSC properties, including a stem cell-associated gene expression signature, long-term tumor-propagating capacity and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. In promoting the self-renewal symmetric division of hTERThigh prostate cancer cells, WNT3a dramatically decreased the ratio of hTERThigh prostate cancer cells undergoing asymmetric division. Increased WNT/beta-catenin signal activation was also detected in hTERThigh prostate cancer cells. hTERT-mediated CSC properties were at least partially dependent on beta-catenin. These findings provide novel cellular and molecular mechanisms for the self-renewal of CSC orchestrated by tumor microenvironmental stimuli and intracellular signals. (C) 2017 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据