4.6 Article

Synthesis and characterization of reinforced hybrid porous beads: Application to the adsorption of malachite green in aqueous solution

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 291-302

出版社

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.12.014

关键词

Porous beads; Pillared montmorillonite; Young's modulus; Malachite green; Adsorption; Kinetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the preparation by an extrusion-dripping method of sodium alginate (SA)/aluminum-pillared montmorillonite (Al-PILMt)/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/calcium carbonate (CaCO3) beads using different percentages of Al-PILMt, PVA and CaCO3. Mechanical and physical characteristics of these reinforced hybrid porous beads (RHPB) were connected to the thermodynamic and kinetic adsorption properties of malachite green (MG). Mechanical properties were investigated using uniaxial compression of single wet bead. The corresponding calculated Young's moduli were found to correlate with the PVA amount which was used in the formulation of the beads. However, these modulus values increased by approximately 70% compared to SA beads taken as references. Beads samples based on PVA and Al-PILMt prove to be more elastic with a better mechanical stability. In contrast, the addition of calcium carbonate in the mixtures leads porous beads PB with a low stiffness less than the RHB. The efficiency of RHPB was evaluated towards the elimination of MG from aqueous solutions. The dye removal, about 8% with SA beads, increased significantly with RHPB (27%) and HPB without PVA (46%). Pseudo first order kinetics with rapid initial adsorption rate and Freundlich equation are respectively used for the description of kinetic and isotherm equilibrium results. Obtained results by the principal component analysis (PCA) method showed the influence of the two main structural variations (i.e. porosity and stiffness) on their adsorption properties. (C) 2016 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved..

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据