4.6 Article

Structural and Epimeric Isomers of HPPH [3-Devinyl 3-{1-(1-hexyloxy) ethyl}pyropheophorbide-a]: Effects on Uptake and Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 933-946

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00023

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA 55791]
  2. Roswell Park Cancer Support Grant [P30CA016056]
  3. research supplement to promote diversity in health related research [CA 55791S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tetrapyrrole structure of porphyrins used as. photosentizing agents is thought to:determine uptake, and retention by malignant epithelial cancer cells. To assess the contribution, of the oxidized state of individual rings to. these cellular processes, bacteriochlorophyll a was converted into the ring D reduced 3-deviny1-3- [1-(1-,bexyloxy)ethy1] pyropheophorbide-a (HPPH) and the corresponding ring B reduced isomer (iso-HPPH). The carboxylic acid,analogs of both ring B.and ring D reduced isomers showed Several fold higher: accumulatiOn into the mitochondria and endoplasmie' reticulum,by primary culture of human lung and head and heck cancer, cells than the corresponding, methyl ester analogs that localize, primarily to granular vesicles and, to a lesser extent to mitochondria. However, long-term cellular retention of these cornpounds exhibited an inverse relationship, With tumor cells: generally retaining better the methyl-ester derivatives: In vivo distribution and tumor uptake was evaluated in the model of BALB/c mice bearing Colon26 tumors using the respective C-14-labeled analogs. Both carboxylic acid derivatives demonstrated Similar intracellular localization and long, term tumor cure with no: significant skin phototoxicity. PDT-mediated tumor action involved vascular damage; which was, confirmed a reduction in blood flow and immunohistochemical assessment of damage to the vascular endothelium. The HPPH stereoisomers (epimers), showed identical uptake vitro & in vivo)intracellular retention and photpreaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据