3.9 Article

Volt-Time Curve Prediction of Distribution Insulators Under Standard and Typical Lightning Overvoltages Using the Disruptive Effect Method

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40313-016-0297-4

关键词

Disruptive effect method; Non-standard lightning impulse voltage waveforms; Lightning impulse withstand voltage; Medium voltage insulators; Volt-time curve; Dielectric withstand

资金

  1. CAPES-Brazilian Federal Agency
  2. SAE TOWERS Brasil Torres de Transmissao Ltda

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through the development of detection and measurement systems for lightning strokes, the possibility arose for the identification of the characteristic parameters of lightning current and the resulting voltage waveforms that stress the power system insulating equipment. The real lightning voltages that stress the insulation may vary over a wide type of waveforms and may also differ significantly from the standard 1.2/50 mu s lightning impulse voltage. Therefore, the prediction of volt-time characteristics of any insulating material for such non-standard voltages is required for a proper insulation design. In this regard, this paper aims at evaluating the dielectric behaviour of medium voltage insulators subjected to voltage impulses with standard and non-standard waveforms, by applying the disruptive effect method. The non-standard lightning overvoltage waveforms considered in this study were based on lightning overvoltages produced by real return stroke current waveforms observed on conveyed measurement data. The investigation involves a comparison between measured and predicted voltage-time characteristics of insulators, considering single-peaked and double-peaked non-standard impulsive voltage waveforms as well as the standard lightning impulse voltage. Three different types of insulating arrangement involving 15- and 25-kV pin-type porcelain insulators were investigated. The estimation of the parameters required for this prediction method was performed using a simulation language available at ATP/ATPDraw software called MODELS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据