3.8 Proceedings Paper

Preliminary results of instrumented laboratory flow slides

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.012

关键词

liquefaction; flow slide; scale model test

资金

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW, Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation
  3. Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V.
  4. Rijkswaterstaat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The liquefaction tank is an experimental facility developed to conduct physical scale model tests of liquefaction flow slides. We developed the liquefaction tank to evaluate the performance of advanced numerical models for submerged slopes composed of sand. For the long-term, the research with the liquefaction tank aims at composing a database with high-quality experimental results of liquefaction flow slides, in which properties related to the soil, degree of saturation, geometry, triggering and mitigating measures will be varied. This paper addresses the first results obtained with the liquefaction tank. We used a fluidization system to create a uniform, loosely packed sand bed. The liquefaction tank was subsequently tilted uniformly, while measuring the pore pressures at the base of the sand bed. Furthermore, the stability of the slope was monitored using a camera system pointed at the transparent side of the tank. We conducted around 30 tilting tests on a level sand bed while varying consolidation time, density and tilting rate. We were able to reproduce liquefaction flow slides below a particular threshold density. The moment of failure was noted by an instant, uniform liquefaction of the sand bed, preceded by an abrupt increase of excess pore pressures. The results in terms of failure angle and measured pore pressures were consistent and reproducible. The measured failure angle was much lower than anticipated from results of element tests (e.g. triaxial tests) in literature. Future research aims at relating the results to the response during undrained triaxial tests and the effect of mitigating measures. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据