4.6 Article

Establishing a high yielding streptomyces-based cell-free protein synthesis system

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 114, 期 6, 页码 1343-1353

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.26253

关键词

cell-free protein synthesis; high GC-content genes; in vitro transcription and translation; natural products; Streptomyces; synthetic biology

资金

  1. DARPA 1KM program [HR0011-15-C-0084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) has emerged as a powerful platform for applied biotechnology and synthetic biology, with a range of applications in synthesizing proteins, evolving proteins, and prototyping genetic circuits. To expand the current CFPS repertoire, we report here the development and optimization of a Streptomyces-based CFPS system for the expression of GC-rich genes. By developing a streamlined crude extract preparation protocol and optimizing reaction conditions, we were able to achieve active enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) yields of greater than 50g/mL with batch reactions lasting up to 3h. By adopting a semi-continuous reaction format, the EGFP yield could be increased to 282 +/- 8g/mL and the reaction time was extended to 48h. Notably, our extract preparation procedures were robust to multiple Streptomyces lividans and Streptomyces coelicolor strains, although expression yields varied. We show that our optimized Streptomyces lividans system provides benefits when compared to an Escherichia coli-based CFPS system for increasing percent soluble protein expression for four Streptomyces-originated high GC-content genes that are involved in biosynthesis of the nonribosomal peptides tambromycin and valinomycin. Looking forward, we believe that our Streptomyces-based CFPS system will contribute significantly towards efforts to express complex natural product gene clusters (e.g., nonribosomal peptides and polyketides), providing a new avenue for obtaining and studying natural product biosynthesis pathways. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 1343-1353. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据