4.8 Article

Rough Structure of Electrodeposition as a Template for an Ultrarobust Self-Cleaning Surface

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 19, 页码 16571-16580

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b15745

关键词

self-cleaning surface; superamphiphobic; electrodeposition; micro- and nanostructures; ultrarobust surface

资金

  1. Frontier and Key Technical Innovation of Guangdong Province [2015B010122001]
  2. NSFC-Liaoning [U1508213]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superhydrophobic surfaces with self-cleaning properties have been developed based on roughness on the micro- and nanometer scales and low-energy surfaces. However, such surfaces are fragile and stop functioning when exposed to oil. Addressing these challenges, here we show an ultrarobust self-cleaning surface fabricated by a process of metal electrodeposition of a rough structure that is subsequently coated with fluorinated metal-oxide nanoparticles. Scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction were employed to characterize the surfaces. The micro and nanoscale roughness jointly with the low surface energy imparted by the fluorinated nanoparticles yielded surfaces with water contact angle of 164.1 degrees and a sliding angle of 3.2 degrees. Most interestingly, the surface exhibits fascinating mechanical stability after finger-wipe, knife-scratch, sand abrasion, and sandpaper abrasion tests. It is found that the surface with superamphiphobic properties has excellent repellency toward common corrosive liquids and low-surface-energy substances. Amazingly, the surface exhibited excellent self-cleaning ability and remained intact even after its top layer was exposed to SO abrasion cycles with sandpaper and oil contamination. It is believed that this simple, unique, and practical method can provide new approaches for effectively solving the stability issue of superhydrophobic surfaces and could extend to a variety of metallic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据