4.6 Article

Core-shell structured CaO-Ca9Al6O18@Ca5Al6O14/Ni bifunctional material for sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 114-122

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.036

关键词

Sorption-enhanced steam methane; reforming; Core-shell structure; Bifunctional material; H-2 production; Stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21276076]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0801]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [222201313011]
  4. 111 project [B08021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming (SESMR) is a promising technology for H-2 production, which can be further enhanced at the particle scale by using core (sorbent)-shell (catalyst) structured bifunctional materials. However, it is challenging but desirable to develop such materials with high activity and stability. In this work, three core-shell structured CaO-Ca9Al6O18@Ca5Al6O14/Ni bifunctional materials with varying CaO content and core/shell mass ratio were prepared by a two-step sol-gel method, and two others (Ni/CaO and CaO@Ca5Al6O14/Ni) served as references. The structural properties and catalytic performance of the materials were investigated. The results showed that all core-shell materials during cyclic SESMR operation had much better performance than Ni/CaO with regards to activity, stability and CaO utilization, and CaO-Ca9Al6O18@Ca5Al6O14/Ni was generally superior to CaO@Ca5Al6O14/Ni except when the former had a much higher CaO content than the latter. The excellent performance of CaO-Ca9Al6O18@Ca5Al6O14/Ni was mainly due to the stabilization effect of Ca9Al6O18 and the support effect of Ca5Al6O14. The best material was a CaO-Ca9Al6O18@Ca5Al6O14/Ni with a CaO content of 13 wt% and a core/shell mass ratio of 0.2, showing high activity and stability over 60 SESMR cycles while maintaining nearly complete utilization of CaO. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据