4.5 Article

Regeneration-associated genes decline in chronically injured rat sciatic motoneurons

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 42, 期 10, 页码 2783-2791

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13070

关键词

actin; axotomy; chronic nerve injury; GAP-43; motoneuron; tubulin

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic nerve injuries are notorious for their poor regenerative outcomes. Here, we addressed the question of whether the established reduced ability of injured motoneurons to regenerate their axons with time of disconnection with targets (chronic axotomy) is associated with a failure of injured motoneurons to express and sustain their expression of regeneration-associated genes. Sciatic motoneurons were prevented from regenerating by ligation of the transected nerves (chronic axotomy), and then subjected to a second nerve transection (acute axotomy) to mimic the clinical surgical procedure of refreshing the proximal nerve stump prior to delayed nerve repair. The expression of alpha(1)-tubulin, actin and GAP-43 mRNA was analysed in axotomized sciatic motoneurons by the use of in situ hybridization followed by autoradiography and silver grain quantification. The expression of these regeneration-associated genes by naive (acutely) axotomized motoneurons declined exponentially, to reach baseline levels within 6 months. These chronically injured motoneurons responded to a refreshment axotomy by elevating the expression of the genes to the same levels as in acutely (i.e. for the first time) axotomized sciatic motoneurons. However, the expression of these declined more rapidly than after acute axotomy. We conclude that a progressive decline in the expression of the regeneration-associated genes in chronically axotomized motoneurons and the even more rapid decline in their expression in response to a refreshment axotomy may explain why the regenerative capacity of chronically axotomized neurons declines with time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据