4.7 Article

Women Benefit More Than Men in Response to College-based Meditation Training

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00551

关键词

mindfulness; meditation; gender; emotion; affect

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [MH067553-05, K23-AT006328-01A1]
  2. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) [UH2AT009145]
  3. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR)
  4. Mind and Life Institute
  5. Lenz Foundation
  6. Hershey Foundation
  7. Brown University Contemplative Studies Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: While recent literature has shown that mindfulness training has positive effects on treating anxiety and depression, there has been virtually no research investigating whether effects differ across genders-despite the fact that men and women differ in clinically significant ways. The current study investigated whether college-based meditation training had different effects on negative affect for men and women. Methods: Seventy-seven university students (36 women, age = 20.7 +/- 3.0 years) participated in 12-week courses with meditation training components. They completed self-report questionnaires of affect, mindfulness, and self-compassion before and after the course. Results: Compared to men, women showed greater decreases in negative affect and greater increases on scales measuring mindfulness and self-compassion. Women's improvements in negative affect were correlated to improvements in measures of both mindfulness skills and self-compassion. In contrast, men showed non-significant increases in negative affect, and changes in affect were only correlated with ability to describe emotions, not any measures of experiential or self-acceptance. Conclusion: These findings suggest that women may have more favorable responses than men to school-based mindfulness training, and that the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions may be maximized by gender-specific modifications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据