4.5 Article

Predictive and prognostic role of serum neopterin and tryptophan breakdown in prostate cancer

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 108, 期 4, 页码 663-670

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.13171

关键词

Biochemical recurrence; biomarker; neopterin; prostate cancer; tryptophan degradation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The -interferon-induced enzymes indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and GTP-cyclohydrolase are key players in tumor immune escape mechanisms. We quantified serum levels of neopterin and tryptophan breakdown (tryptophan, kynurenine, and kynurenine-to-tryptophan ratio) in addition to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients (n=100) before radical prostatectomy (RP) as well as at time of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP (n=50) in comparison to healthy men (n=49). Effects of biomarkers on the risk of PCa diagnosis on transrectal biopsy, worse histopathological characteristics of the RP specimens, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after BCR were investigated. Neopterin (hazard ratio [HR], 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-5.61; P=0.032) and kynurenine (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.26-6.79; P=0.012) levels were univariately associated with CSS. When adjusted for other biomarkers, only neopterin remained an independent predictor of CSS (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.07-6.12; P=0.035). Only PSA was associated with an increased risk of PCa diagnosis on biopsy, univariately (odds ratio, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.68-5.88; P<0.001) as well when adjusted for other biomarkers (odds ratio, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.70-6.35; P<0.001). Moreover, only preoperative PSA was able to predict positive surgical margin (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]=0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82; P=0.001), higher Gleason score (AUC=0.75; 95% CI, 0.66-0.85; P<0.001) and extraprostatic involvement (AUC=0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.88; P<0.001) at RP specimens, respectively. Although serum neopterin and tryptophan breakdown cannot be considered as biomarkers in detecting PCa or in predicting worse final pathological findings, neopterin levels are useful for stratifying patients into different prognostic groups after BCR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据