4.6 Article

Dissemination and Implementation Science Training Needs: Insights From Practitioners and Researchers

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 S322-S329

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute at NIH [5R25CA171994-02, 5R01CA160327]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [1P30DK092950]
  3. Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences grant from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1 TR000448, KL2 TR000450]
  4. American Cancer Society
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences component of NIH [UL1TR000439]
  6. NIH roadmap for Medical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Dissemination and implementation research training has great potential to improve the impact and reach of health-related research; however, research training needs from the end user perspective are unknown. This paper identifies and prioritizes dissemination and implementation research training needs. Methods: A diverse sample of researchers, practitioners, and policymakers was invited to participate in Concept Mapping in 2014-2015. Phase 1 (Brainstorming) gathered participants' responses to the prompt: To improve the impact of research evidence in practice and policy settings, a skill in which researchers need more training is... The resulting statement list was edited and included subsequent phases. Phase 2 (Sorting) asked participants to sort each statement into conceptual piles. In Phase 3 (Rating), participants rated the difficulty and importance of incorporating each statement into a training curriculum. A multidisciplinary team synthesized and interpreted the results in 2015-2016. Results: During Brainstorming, 60 researchers and 60 practitioners/policymakers contributed 274 unique statements. Twenty-nine researchers and 16 practitioners completed sorting and rating. Nine concept clusters were identified: Communicating Research Findings, Improve Practice Partnerships, Make Research More Relevant, Strengthen Communication Skills, Develop Research Methods and Measures, Consider and Enhance Fit, Build Capacity for Research, and Understand Multilevel Context. Though researchers and practitioners had high agreement about importance (r=0.93) and difficulty (r=0.80), ratings differed for several clusters (e.g., Build Capacity for Research). Conclusions: Including researcher and practitioner perspectives in competency development for dissemination and implementation research identifies skills and capacities needed to conduct and communicate contextualized, meaningful, and relevant research. (C) 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据