4.7 Article

Investigation of interfacial heat transfer mechanism for 7075-T6 aluminum alloy in HFQ hot forming process

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 266-282

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.02.107

关键词

Hot forming; HFQ; IHTC; Beck's method; 7075-T6; Heat transfer mechanism

资金

  1. Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [11272075]
  2. China's Post-doctoral Science Fund [2014M561223]
  3. Fundamental Research Fund for the Central University [DUT16RC(4)28]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The IHTC (Interfacial-Heat-Transfer-Coefficient) between aluminum alloy and die during HFQ (Heat-Forming-Quenching) process is an important thermal parameter to reflect the heat transfer efficiency. In the present work, the instantaneous heat transfer law for high strength 7075-T6 alloy during HFQ process based on cylindrical-die model was investigated. The accuracy of IHTC calculated by Beck's non-linear estimation method (Beck's method) and heat balance method (HBM) were compared, and instantaneous IHTC of 7075-T6 alloy was acquired in experiment and analyzed in consideration of different contact pressure, surface roughness and lubricate conditions. Furthermore, the obtained IHTC was applied to the simulation process of typical U-type experimental model in order to validate the universality of heat transfer law. The result shows that the average IHTC goes near to 3300 W/m(2).K when pressure is above 80 MPa; Surface roughness can also affect the IHTC in HFQ process, but the effect mechanism is different from the boron steel in hot stamping process. The average IHTC decreases sharply when surface roughness increases in the range of 0.570-0.836 mu m, the value is from 3453 W/m(2).K to 2001 W/m(2).K under 80 MPa. Furthermore, surface lubrication can promote heat transfer efficiency and increase IHTC value when contact pressure is relatively high. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据