4.6 Article

Decreased functional connectivity between the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and lingual gyrus in Alzheimer's disease patients with depression

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 326, 期 -, 页码 132-138

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.037

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Depression; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Functional connectivity; Anterior cingulate cortex

资金

  1. Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University
  2. General Project of the Department of Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province [2017KY109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Depression is one of the most common psychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease (AD), occurring in up to 40% of AD patients. It influences the cognitive function of patients and increases the burden on their caregivers. Currently, there are few effective medical treatments for reducing the symptoms of depression in AD patients. Understanding the underlying neurobiological mechanisms in AD patients with depression (D-AD) is crucial for developing effective interventions. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is an important brain region involved in emotional and cognitive processing. Several functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown that patients with major depressive disorder have structural, functional, and metabolic abnormalities in the ACC. Methods: We investigated the resting-state functional connectivity (FC) of ACC subregions in 15 D-AD patients and 17 non-depressed AD (nD-AD) patients, by parcellating the ACC into the rostral and dorsal ACC (dACC). Results: Our results revealed that D -AD patients have decreased FC between the dACC and the right occipital lobe and right lingual gyrus, compared with nD-AD patients. Conclusions: Decreased FC between the dACC and the right occipital lobe and right lingual gyrus may play an important role in the neuropathophysiology of depression in AD. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据