4.7 Article

Inverse identification of multiple temporal sources releasing the same tracer gaseous pollutant

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 184-195

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.03.026

关键词

Inverse model; Multiple sources; Temporal release; Rate profile; CFD

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51622804]
  2. National Key Basic Research and Development Program [2016YFC0700500]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [201602183]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When an accidental release of indoor airborne pollutants occurs, it is critical to promptly identify the pollutant sources. Current inverse models concentrate on the identification of a single pollutant source or multiple pollutant sources in a simplified puff or constant release scenarios. This investigation proposes an inverse model to precisely determine the locations and temporal release rate profiles of multiple sources releasing the same tracer gaseous pollutant. The model first constitutes a number of candidate group sources by assuming known release positions. Then Tikhonov-based matrix inversion is implemented to solve for the release rate profiles of each candidate group of sources. The concentrations provided by the sensors in the same number of the isolated sources are the known inputs for the matrix inversion. As for the multiple candidate group sources, the occurrence probability of each group is determined by the Bayesian model after matching the concentration with one additional sensor. The above strategy was applied to identify the same pollutant accidentally released by two passengers in a three-dimensional aircraft cabin. The pollutant was from the exhalation points and discharged in an intermittent sinusoidal wave and a square wave of ten seconds, respectively. The results show that the proposed method can correctly determine the locations of multiple temporally released sources. The relative errors between the inversely identified release rates and the CFD-simulated actual rates are generally less than 15%. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据