4.7 Article

Dissolved carbon biogeochemistry and export in mangrove-dominated rivers of the Florida Everglades

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 2543-2559

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-14-2543-2017

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Water Information System
  2. National Park Service through the Critical Ecosystem Studies Initiative [H5284-08-0029]
  3. National Science Foundation through the Water Sustainability and Climate solicitation [EAR 1038855]
  4. Florida Coastal Everglades Long-Term Ecological Research program under National Science Foundation [DBI-0620409, DEB-1237517]
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1237517] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Shark and Harney rivers, located on the southwest coast of Florida, USA, originate in the freshwater, karstic marshes of the Everglades and flow through the largest contiguous mangrove forest in North America. In November 2010 and 2011, dissolved carbon source-sink dynamics was examined in these rivers during SF6 tracer release experiments. Approximately 80% of the total dissolved carbon flux out of the Shark and Harney rivers during these experiments was in the form of inorganic carbon, either via air-water CO2 exchange or longitudinal flux of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) to the coastal ocean. Between 42 and 48% of the total mangrove-derived DIC flux into the rivers was emitted to the atmosphere, with the remaining being discharged to the coastal ocean. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) represented ca. 10% of the total mangrove-derived dissolved carbon flux from the forests to the rivers. The sum of mangrove-derived DIC and DOC export from the forest to these rivers was estimated to be at least 18.9 to 24.5 mmol m(-2) d(-1), a rate lower than other independent estimates from Shark River and from other mangrove forests. Results from these experiments also suggest that in Shark and Harney rivers, mangrove contribution to the estuarine flux of dissolved carbon to the ocean is less than 10%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据