4.5 Article

Surgical Decompression for Chiari Malformation Type I: An Age-Based Outcomes Study Based on the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 285-290

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.162

关键词

Chiari decompression; Chiari malformation type I; Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale; Outcome study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: There is currently inadequate evidence on the efficacy of surgical decompression for Chiari malformation type I (CM1) in different age groups of patients. In this study, we compared postoperative outcomes across 3 different age groups using the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS). METHODS: A total of 144 patients who underwent Chiari decompression at our institution between 2008 and 2014 were divided into 3 groups: group A, children age 0-18 years; group B, younger adults age 19-40 years; and group C, older adults, age 41D years. Patient outcomes were assigned a numerical value based on the CCOS and subjected to statistical analysis. Direct comparisons were made across the 3 age groups. RESULTS: The mean overall score was 14.0 over a mean follow-up of 27.2 months. All 3 groups demonstrated clinical improvement following Chiari decompression; however, group A demonstrated significantly better postoperative improvements than groups B and C in total CCOS scores (7.8% and 12.2%, respectively; P < 0.001) and all the component scores except complications. Group B was not significantly different from group C in total score or any of the component scores. There was a logarithmic relationship between age and outcome (R-2 = 0.64), in which the outcome scores experienced an initial decline with increasing age but leveled off by early adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: A direct comparison among the age groups revealed a negative age effect on surgical decompression outcomes in CM1 patients. Children performed significantly better than younger and older adults. This finding supports early surgical intervention for symptomatic pediatric patients to achieve long-term surgical benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据