4.5 Article

Discovering residential electricity consumption patterns through smart-meter data mining: A case study from China

期刊

UTILITIES POLICY
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 73-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2017.01.004

关键词

Residential electricity consumption; Smart power use; Smart-meter data

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501056]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JZ2016HGTB0728]
  3. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation Program [1608085QG165]
  4. Anhui Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project [AHSKQ2015D42]
  5. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71521001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing penetration of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in energy systems, traditional energy systems are being digitized. Advanced analysis of the energy production and consumption data and data-driven decision support can be combined to promote the fortnation and development of smart energy systems. Smart grids are a specific application of smart energy systems. Different electricity consumption patterns of residential users can be discovered and extracted by clustering analysis of the electricity consumption data collected by smart meters and other data acquisition terminals in a smart grid. This research explores daily electricity consumption patterns of low-voltage residential users in China. The service architecture of smart power use and the structure of electric energy data acquisition system of the State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) are introduced and a process model for mining daily electricity consumption data is presented. The analysis is based on the fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering method and a fuzzy cluster validity index (PBMF). A case study of Kunshan City, Jiangsu Province, China is presented, using the daily electricity consumption data of 1312 low-voltage users within a month. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据