期刊
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 227-234出版社
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.011
关键词
Automated driving; Simulator validity; Transfer of control; Vehicle automation; Driver behaviour
类别
资金
- European Marie Curie ITN project HFAuto - Human Factors of Automated driving [PITN-GA-2013-605817]
Background: Whilst previous research has explored how driver behaviour in simulators may transfer to the open road, there has been relatively little research showing the same transfer within the field of driving automation. As a consequence, most research into human-automation interaction has primarily been carried out in a research laboratory or on closed-circuit test tracks. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess whether research into non-critical control transactions in highly automated vehicles performed in driving simulators correlate with road driving conditions. Method: Twenty six drivers drove a highway scenario using an automated driving mode in the simulator and twelve drivers drove on a public motorway in a Tesla Model S with the Autopilot activated. Drivers were asked to relinquish, or resume control from the automation when prompted by the vehicle interface in both the simulator and on road condition. Results: Drivers were generally faster to resume control in the on-road driving condition. However, strong positive correlations were found between the simulator and on road driving conditions for drivers transferring control to and from automation. No significant differences were found with regard to workload, perceived usefulness and satisfaction between the simulator and on-road drives. Conclusion: The results indicate high levels of relative validity of driving simulators as a research tool for automated driving research. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据