4.6 Article

Chrysanthemum-derived N and S co-doped porous carbon for efficient oxygen reduction reaction and aluminum-air battery

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 239, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.002

关键词

chrysanthemum; N,S dual-doped porous carbon; oxygen reduction reaction; fuel cells; aluminum-air battery

资金

  1. Jiangsu Province Biomass Energy and Materials Laboratory, China [JSBEM-S-201603]
  2. National Natural Science Fund [31570563]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Implementation of cheap and efficient electrocatalysts towards oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) falls in the central focus on fulfilling cost-affordable and high-performance fuel cells and metal-air batteries. In this study, N and S dual-doped porous carbon was prepared by a facile strategy for using tribute chrysanthemum as precursor and zinc chloride as activating agent. The catalyst prepared at 800 degrees C (NSC800) depicts multiscale porous with large specific surface area (810 m(2) g(-1)) and abundant exposed intrinsic dopants. The electrochemical characterizations exhibit that its onset potential is 0.0966 V versus Hg/HgO electrode, much higher than that of the other reported N, S co-doped carbons, and it also shows the better methanol tolerance, carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning and stability than commercial Pt/C. Consequently, NSC800 catalyst shows attractive properties when used as the air cathode of a home-made primary aluminum-air battery, e.g., an open-circuit potential of ca. 1.64 V, a discharge specific capacity of 288 mAh g(-1), and a peak power density of 46 mW cm(-2). Such attractive performances could be mainly attributed to the synergistic effect of exposed intrinsic N and S active sites and increased specific surface area with multiscale porous. Our idea on developing such doped carbons by utilizing extensive intrinsic components of biomass would be a promising strategy to cathode electrocatalyst for fuel cells and metal-air batteries. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据