4.8 Article

A multi-animal tracker for studying complex behaviors

期刊

BMC BIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12915-017-0363-9

关键词

Multi-animal tracking; Image analyses; Chemotaxis; C. elegans; Locomotion

类别

资金

  1. ERC [336803]
  2. American Federation for Aging Research (AFAR)
  3. Joseph H. fund
  4. Belle R. Braun fund
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [336803] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Animals exhibit astonishingly complex behaviors. Studying the subtle features of these behaviors requires quantitative, high-throughput, and accurate systems that can cope with the often rich perplexing data. Results: Here, we present a Multi-Animal Tracker (MAT) that provides a user-friendly, end-to-end solution for imaging, tracking, and analyzing complex behaviors of multiple animals simultaneously. At the core of the tracker is a machine learning algorithm that provides immense flexibility to image various animals (e.g., worms, flies, zebrafish, etc.) under different experimental setups and conditions. Focusing on C. elegans worms, we demonstrate the vast advantages of using this MAT in studying complex behaviors. Beginning with chemotaxis, we show that approximately 100 animals can be tracked simultaneously, providing rich behavioral data. Interestingly, we reveal that worms' directional changes are biased, rather than random - a strategy that significantly enhances chemotaxis performance. Next, we show that worms can integrate environmental information and that directional changes mediate the enhanced chemotaxis towards richer environments. Finally, offering high-throughput and accurate tracking, we show that the system is highly suitable for longitudinal studies of aging- and proteotoxicity-associated locomotion deficits, enabling large-scale drug and genetic screens. Conclusions: Together, our tracker provides a powerful and simple system to study complex behaviors in a quantitative, high-throughput, and accurate manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据