4.7 Article

Pilot Study of 64Cu(I) for PET Imaging of Melanoma

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02691-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0008397]
  2. NCI In Vivo Cellular Molecular Imaging Center (ICMIC) [P50 CA114747]
  3. National Science Foundation for Scholars of China [81571703]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Talent Program [2015PJD006]
  5. Zhongshan Hospital Outstanding Youth Talent Program [2015ZSYXQN17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At present, Cu-64(II) labeled tracers including (CuCl2)-Cu-64 have been widely applied in the research of molecular imaging and therapy. Human copper transporter 1 ( hCTR1) is the major high affinity copper influx transporter in mammalian cells, and specially responsible for the transportation of Cu( I) not Cu( II). Thus, we investigated the feasible application of Cu-64( I) for PET imaging. Cu-64( II) was reduced to Cu-64( I) with the existence of sodium L-ascorbate, DL-Dithiothreitol or cysteine. Cell uptake and efflux assay was investigated using B16F10 and A375 cell lines, respectively. Small animal PET and biodistribution studies were performed in both B16F10 and A375 tumor-bearing mice. Compared with Cu-64( II), Cu-64( I) exhibited higher cellular uptake by melanoma, which testified CTR1 specially influx of Cu( I). However, due to oxidation reaction in vivo, no significant difference between Cu-64( I) and Cu-64( II) was observed through PET images and biodistribution. Additionally, radiation absorbed doses for major tissues of human were calculated based on the mouse biodistribution. Radiodosimetry calculations for Cu-64/67( I) and Cu-64/67( II) were similar, which suggested that although melanoma were with high radiation absorbed doses, high radioactivity accumulation by liver and kidney should be noticed for the further application. Thus, Cu-64( I) should be further studied to evaluate it as a PET imaging radiotracer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据