4.7 Article

Comparison of three cell-based drug screening platforms for HSV-1 infection

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 136-140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.03.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [5R01MH063480-12, 5R01MH045817]
  2. Scioto Foundation [07R-1712]
  3. Pittsburgh Center for Kidney Research Kidney Imaging Core [NIH P30 DK079307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acyclovir (ACV) and its derivatives have been highly effective for treating recurrent, lytic infections with Herpes Simplex Virus, type 1 (HSV-1), but searches for additional antiviral drugs are motivated by recent reports of resistance to ACV, particularly among immunocompromised patients. In addition, the relative neurotoxicity of ACV and its inability to prevent neurological sequelae among HSV-1 encephalitis survivors compel searches for new drugs to treat HSV-1 infections of the central nervous system (CNS). Primary drug screens for neurotropic viruses like HSV-1 typically utilize non-neuronal cell lines, but they may miss drugs that have neuron specific antiviral effects. Therefore, we compared the effects of a panel of conventional and novel anti-herpetic compounds in monkey epithelial (Vero) cells, human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and hiPSC-derived neurons (N = 73 drugs). While the profiles of activity for the majority of the drugs were similar in all three tissues, Vero cells were less likely than NPCs to identify drugs with substantial inhibitory activity in hiPSCderived neurons. We discuss the relative merits of each cell type for antiviral drug screens against neuronal infections with HSV-1. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据