4.6 Article

Increased detection of genetic loci associated with risk predictors of osteoporotic fracture using a pleiotropic cFDR method

期刊

BONE
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 62-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.03.052

关键词

Osteoporosis; Association; Bone mineral density; Human genetics

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P50AR055081, R01AG026564, R01AR050496, R01AR057049]
  2. Tulane University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although GWAS have been successful in identifying some osteoporosis associated loci, the findings explain only a small fraction of the total genetic variance. In this study we use a recently developed novel pleiotropic conditional false discovery rate (cFDR) method to identify novel genetic loci associated with two risk traits for osteoporotic fracture (the clinical outcome and end result of osteoporosis), Height (HT) and Femoral Neck (FNK) BMD. The cFDR method allows us to improve the detection of associated variants by incorporating any potentially shared genetic mechanisms between the two associated traits. We analyzed the summary statistics from two GWAS meta-analyses for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are associated with HT and FNK BMD. Using the cFDR method, we show enrichment in the identification of SNPs associated with each trait conditioned on their strength of association with the second trait. The findings revealed 18 SNPs that are associated with both HT and FNK BMD, 4 of which had not previously been reported to play a role in bone health. The novel SNPs located at K1F1B and the intergenic region between FERD3L and TWISTNB are noteworthy as these genes may be associated with processes that are functionally important in bone metabolism. By leveraging GWAS results from related phenotypes we identified several novel loci that may contribute to the proportion of variability explained for each trait, although we cannot speculate about these potential contributions to heritability based on this analysis alone. (c) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据