4.7 Article

Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into skeletal muscle progenitor cells by transcription factors enriched in undifferentiated subpopulation of satellite cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08232-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows
  2. Intramural Research Grant for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP [28-6]
  3. Research Funds for Development of cell transplantation methods for refractory muscle diseases
  4. Research on refractory musculoskeletal diseases using disease-specific induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from Research Center Network for Realization of Regenerative Medicine, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  5. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K09876, 15KK0332, 16H05330] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Satellite cells comprise a functionally heterogeneous population of stem cells in skeletal muscle. Separation of an undifferentiated subpopulation and elucidation of its molecular background are necessary to identify the reprogramming factors to induce skeletal muscle progenitor cells. In this study, we found that intracellular esterase activity distinguishes a subpopulation of cultured satellite cells with high stemness using esterase-sensitive cell staining reagent, calcein-AM. Gene expression analysis of this subpopulation revealed that defined combinations of transcription factors (Pax3, Mef2b, and Pitx1 or Pax7, Mef2b, and Pitx1 in embryonic fibroblasts, and Pax7, Mef2b and MyoD in adult fibroblasts) reprogrammed fibroblasts into skeletal muscle progenitor cells. These reprogrammed cells formed Dystrophin-positive mature muscle fibers when transplanted into a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. These results highlight the new marker for heterogenous population of cultured satellite cells, potential therapeutic approaches and cell sources for degenerative muscle diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据