4.2 Article

Long-term results and tolerability of tandem peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y/177Lu-DOTATATE in neuroendocrine tumors with respect to the primary location: a 10-year study

期刊

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 347-356

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-017-1163-6

关键词

PRRT; Y-90/Lu-177-DOTATATE; Tandem therapy; Somatostatin receptor; Neuroendocrine tumors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Y-90 and Lu-177 is a form of molecular targeted therapy for inoperable or disseminated neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical results and long-term side effects of tandem Y-90 /Lu-177-DOTATATE therapy in patients with NET. Additionally, we evaluated clinical results with reference to the primary site. 59 patients with disseminated NET were included in the study prospectively. 3-5 cycles of combined 1:1 Y-90/Lu-177-DOTATATE (total injected activity 11.1-16.65 GBq) with mixed amino acids for kidney protection were performed. During a median follow-up of 75.8 months, the PFS was 32.2 months, and the OS was 82 months; 25 patients died. Depending on primary tumor's site, the PFS and the OS for pancreatic NET vs. small bowel, NET vs. large bowel, NET were 30.4 vs. 29.5 vs. 40.3 and 78.9 vs. 58.1 vs. 82.5, respectively. The observed 5-year overall survival was 63%, and a 2-year risk of progression was 39.4%. The following imaging response was observed: CR in 2%, PR in 22%, SD in 65%, and PD in 6% patients. The disease control rate was 89%. The objective response rate was 24%. The PRRT was well tolerated by all patients. One patient (2%) revealed MDS, and one patient (2%) grade 3 nephrotoxicity. No other grade 3 and 4 hematological or renal toxicity was observed. These results indicated the tandem Y-90/Lu-177-DOTATATE therapy for patients with disseminated/inoperable NET as highly effective and safe, considering long-term side effects. In the majority of patients, clinical improvement was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据