4.7 Article

Memory-type ST2+CD4+T cells participate in the steroid-resistant pathology of eosinophilic pneumonia

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06962-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT Japan) [26221305, 00707193]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
  3. Practical Research Project for Allergic Diseases and Immunology from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  4. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  5. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  6. Osaka Foundation for Promotion of Fundamental Medical Research
  7. Kanae Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science
  8. Takeda Science Foundation
  9. Naito Foundation
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K08876, 26221305] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lung develops an unique epithelial barrier system to protect host from continuous invasion of various harmful particles. Interleukin (IL-)33 released from epithelial cells in the lung drives the type 2 immune response by activating ST2-expressed immune cells in various allergic diseases. However, the involvement of memory-type ST2(+)CD4(+)T cells in such lung inflammation remains unclear. Here we demonstrated that intratracheal administration of IL-33 resulted in the substantial increase of numbers of tissue-resident memory-type ST2(+)CD4(+)T cells in the lung. Following enhanced production of IL-5 and IL-13, eosinophilic lung inflammation sequentially developed. IL-33-mediated eosinophilic lung inflammation was not fully developed in T cell-deficient Foxn1(nu) mice and NSG mice. Dexamethasone treatment showed limited effects on both the cell number and function of memory-type ST2(+)CD4(+)T cells. Thus our study provides novel insight into the pathogenesis of eosinophilic lung disease, showing that memory-type ST2(+)CD4(+)T cells are involved in IL-33-induced eosinophilic inflammation and elicited steroid-resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据